With respect to international trade, the most important news of recent weeks revolves around the WTO country of original labeling (COOL) decision. WTO has ruled for the final time; the organization upheld previous decisions that COOL is in violation of international trade law. Accordingly, there are now broad calls to repeal the law to ensure avoidance of systematic tariff retaliation from Canada and Mexico.
However, given the law’s history and avid support, doing so might prove somewhat difficult (never mind the WTO ruling). The fallout from here remains to be seen.
Nevertheless, perhaps some perspective around beef trade with our NAFTA partners might inject some important data to the discussion. As such, this week’s illustration highlights annual beef imports and exports with Canada and Mexico.
Following BSE in 2003, our trade balance with our trading partners turned sharply negative in 2004 and 2005. Getting export activity started again proved very challenging and time consuming across the globe. However, that wasn’t necessarily the case with Canada and Mexico; by 2006, beef trade balance had turned positive with the two countries—the U.S. was exporting more value than it was importing.
And before the dollar’s bold run beginning in 2014, thereby hampering exports, beef’s trade balance with Canada and Mexico was approximately $600 million annually for three years running. That level is equivalent to adding approximately $30 to $35 per head for every fed steer and heifer slaughtered in the U.S.
Given those perspectives, what’s your overall perception of beef trade with Canada and Mexico? If the U.S. doesn’t repeal COOL, what impact might that have on the market? Where do you see beef trade with our NAFTA partners headed in the year(s) to come? Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.
You might also like: