Cow weights are bigger but weaning weights are about the same over time. Are we getting better?

Nevil Speer

December 7, 2017

2 Min Read
Cowherd production trends: Are we getting better?

Last week’s Industry At A Glance featured five-year reproduction benchmarks from North Dakota State University. The data was derived from NDSU’s Cow Herd Appraisal Performance Software (CHAPS) Extension outreach. Accordingly, the discussion highlighted CHAPS benchmarks (2003-2017) from a recent long-term assessment by the Extension team. 

This week’s illustration provides a different perspective. That is, the data reflect production (calf weights and cow weights) trends over time. A couple of things are worth noting.

First, not surprisingly, cow weights have increased over time. That is, weights in 2017 are bigger than they were in 2003. However, the biggest jump came about 10 years ago—cow weights, though, have since plateaued. Second, weaning weights have barely nudged albeit with a slight increase. And lastly, the key measure of pounds weaned per cow exposed has remained flat. 

As such, the trends are largely in line with last week’s review around reproduction traits. That is, the cowherd has not changed very much in terms of its productivity. That has some important ramifications, especially when considering many anecdotal observations that commonly occur around cowherd productivity. Moreover, it should also be noted that these trends are right in line with previous coverage of the Kansas Farm Management Association trends. For more on this see: Cowherd Trends are Locked and Loaded. 

And as noted last week, in both cases, (North Dakota and Kansas) the data are likely reflective of what’s occurring across the rest of the country. Perhaps even more important, we’ve also witnessed the cowherd making an important contribution to the overall improvement in beef quality, without sacrificing production—thereby shoring up beef demand and pricing power over time. 

How do you perceive these trends? Are they in line with your operation? Are they consistent with your perception of what’s occurring in the cow/calf sector? Do you foresee any of these trends changing in the coming years? Leave your thoughts in the comments section below. 

Nevil Speer is based in Bowling Green, Ky., and serves as vice president of U.S. operations for AgriClear, Inc. – a wholly-owned subsidiary of TMX Group Limited. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the TMX Group Limited and Natural Gas Exchange Inc.
 

About the Author(s)

Nevil Speer

Nevil Speer serves as an industry consultant and is based in Bowling Green, KY.

Nevil Speer has extensive experience and involvement with the livestock and food industry including various service and consultation projects spanning such issues as market competition, business and economic implications of agroterrorism, animal identification, assessment of price risk and market volatility on the producer segment, and usage of antibiotics in animal agriculture.
 
Dr. Speer writes about many aspects regarding agriculture and the food industry with regular contribution to BEEF and Feedstuffs.  He’s also written several influential industry white papers dealing with issues such as changing business dynamics in the beef complex, producer decision-making, and country-of-origin labeling.
 
He serves as a member of the Board of Directors for the National Institute for Animal Agriculture.
 
Dr. Speer holds both a PhD in Animal Science and a Master’s degree in Business Administration.

Contact him at [email protected].

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
BEEF Magazine is the source for beef production, management and market news.

You May Also Like