Cash fed cattle trade and feedyard returns

Are packers colluding to manipulate the cash fed cattle market? The data say otherwise.

Nevil Speer

May 29, 2019

2 Min Read
Cash Fed Cattle Trade

Over the past few weeks, this column has highlighted some industry perspective regarding captive supplies. The purpose being to provide some perspective surrounding R-CALF’s lawsuit against the four major packers.  

The lawsuit alleges the four major packers conspired to violate U.S. antitrust laws in order to artificially depress prices paid to U.S. cattle producers. R-CALF further alleges that conspiracy occurred through an organized reduction of cattle purchased in the weekly cash market. The implication being that undue influence on the cash market by the packer led to unprecedented profits – at the expense of beef producers.  

Last week’s graph featured the relationship between the level of cash trade and Tyson’s operating margins between for fiscal years 2010 through 2018. Several things are important from that data:

  • The relationship between cash trade and operating margin is positive – that is, as cash trade increases, operating margin also improves. That trend runs contrary to R-CALF’s contention against the packing industry. 

  • Second, that said, the relationship between cash trade and operating margin is weak – nearly 86% of the variation in operating margin is explained by something other than a relationship with the proportion of cash trade. 

This week’s illustration looks at the relationship between cash fed cattle trade and annual feeding returns. The relationship between the two is positive. That is, as cash trade increases, feedyard returns also improve. 

Cash Fed Cattle Trade

However, parallel to last week’s discussion, like packer operating margins, the causal relationship is weak: approximately 85% of the variation in feedyard profitability is explained by something other than a relationship with the proportion of cash trade.  

Similar to last week’s summary, based on this data, it’s a stretch to draw any conclusions about manipulation of the cash market and its influence on closeouts. In both cases, packer operating margins and feedyard returns, there are numerous other factors at work besides the proportion of cash trade. 

Speer serves as an industry consultant and is based in Bowling Green, Ky. Contact him at [email protected]

About the Author(s)

Nevil Speer

Nevil Speer serves as an industry consultant and is based in Bowling Green, KY.

Nevil Speer has extensive experience and involvement with the livestock and food industry including various service and consultation projects spanning such issues as market competition, business and economic implications of agroterrorism, animal identification, assessment of price risk and market volatility on the producer segment, and usage of antibiotics in animal agriculture.
Dr. Speer writes about many aspects regarding agriculture and the food industry with regular contribution to BEEF and Feedstuffs.  He’s also written several influential industry white papers dealing with issues such as changing business dynamics in the beef complex, producer decision-making, and country-of-origin labeling.
He serves as a member of the Board of Directors for the National Institute for Animal Agriculture.
Dr. Speer holds both a PhD in Animal Science and a Master’s degree in Business Administration.

Contact him at [email protected].

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
BEEF Magazine is the source for beef production, management and market news.

You May Also Like