Diverse Cattle Operations Share Goals In Ottumwa Cornbelt Cow-Calf Conference

A summary of the responses from panelist Colin Woodall, NCBA; Tim Kaldenberg, feedlot operator; and Bill Couser, Environmental Stewardship Award Winner and feedlot manager, at the Cornbelt Cow-Calf Conference in Ottumwa, IA, in February.

April 22, 2011

4 Min Read
Beef logo in a gray background | Beef

During the Cornbelt Cow-Calf Conference in Ottumwa, IA, in February, a diverse speaker panel addressed the topic of quality production. Speakers included Iowa producers Tim Kaldenberg from Albia and Bill Couser from Nevada; as well as Colin Woodall, vice president of government affairs for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association.

Couser operates Couser Cattle Co., which won the National Cattlemen’s Foundation Environmental Stewardship Award for 2011. He is a cattle feeder who is also involved in seed production for Monsanto and Pioneer, as well as growing commercial crops. Kaldenberg is a cow-calf producer who feeds out all his calves, in addition to purchasing additional feeders to feed out.

The panel discussion centered on the topic: "To provide a safe, nutritious, consistent quality product for our families and consumers in an environmentally friendly way…without government intervention." A summary of their replies follows:

What do you feel is the greatest industry challenge on your operation?

Couser: Today in this world of urban sprawl, trying to fit in and be good neighbors is one of our bigger challenges. Some people would say that regulations are the biggest and could be; it's a trade off. I have always said that we were here first but still need to fit.

What are the greatest strengths and downfall of an operation your size?

Couser: My family and my team are the greatest strengths we have today with our success. Our biggest downfall as an industry is that we don’t have enough producers out telling the story, and it is one of the best stories to be told! When we tell it as producers, it brings credibility to what we do for a living.

Kaldenberg: Our ability to deliver high-quality cattle with source verification would be one of our greatest strengths. A downfall would be that it is difficult to market large quantities.

In the regulatory arena, is size of operation an advantage or disadvantage?

Woodall: As we look at the regulatory agenda, we remain concerned about all of the proposed rules coming out of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Food and Drug Administration, and many out of USDA. This includes things such as the regulation of dust. As we look at these proposals, it’s obvious that size or type of operation doesn’t make a difference – we are all at risk. With the dust proposal, it doesn’t matter if you are a feedlot or cow-calf operator, you will be in violation if you exceed the levels they are proposing, and these are levels that are not based on science.

What is your biggest environmental challenge?

Couser: Mud and cold have to be the biggest challenge we have in Iowa as far as environmental. We now have different types of structures that we can put up to help control this.

Kaldenberg: Expansion while following governmental regulations is definitely a challenge. We sometimes feel like we should expand more to cover cost associated with the environmental regulations.

What do you see coming down the pike in this area and how do you see it impacting each of these producers?

Woodall: The biggest challenges include EPA regulations of dust, ammonia, greenhouse gas reporting, TMDL in the Chesapeake Bay, and numeric nutrient criteria in Florida. All of these will be detrimental to operations of all sizes. With the Chesapeake Bay and Florida, those regulations will set the precedent for regulations of the Mississippi River Basin.

The biggest concern is that few of these are based on sound, peer-reviewed science. If they go through, it will take millions of dollars to comply, a change of agronomic practices, and mitigation equipment. All will have a negative impact on the bottom line.

What is your marketing program?

Couser: Our marketing program is very defined; we have some type of hedge under all cattle and also try to have most of the feed costs locked up in some form or another.

Kaldenberg: Most home-raised calves are sold on a grid with good premiums. Others are marketed for best price when ready for market.

What do you believe are the greatest obstacles to you in marketing?

Couser: In this type of market, it is very difficult to stay disciplined in a hedging program. If you have a weak stomach and don’t like margin calls, stay away.

Kaldenberg: When premiums are tied to overseas market, foreign countries can put pressure on certain markets or plants. Sometimes freight costs get high for plants that are a long distance off.

What are the issues you see each of these operations facing and are they the same issues?

Woodall: NCBA supports full enforcement of the Packers and Stockyard Act. We also support tools such as mandatory price reporting to help make the market as transparent as possible. However, with things such as the proposed GIPSA rule, we do not support big government telling producers how to market their cattle, where to market their cattle, and what the "standard" price should be for cattle.

--Cornbelt Cow-Calf Conference, Feb. 26, Ottumwa, IA

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
BEEF Magazine is the source for beef production, management and market news.

You May Also Like