Is corn still a viable feeding option?

Depending on cost comparisons, limited supplementation of corn may prove to be a more valuable, cost-efficient manner to add energy to diet of calving and nursing cows versus just feeding more hay.

Nevil Speer

January 26, 2017

2 Min Read
Is corn still a viable feeding option?

Last week’s Industry At A Glance highlighted year-over-year changes in hay acreage. The column noted that hay acreage and subsequent prices will need to be monitored carefully in the coming years as beef cow inventory increases and hay exports become an increasingly important component of the hay market. 

Meanwhile, corn production has proven to be more than ample in recent years. USDA is currently projecting record-large ending stocks of 2.404 billion bushels for the 2016-17 corn-marketing year. So, while feed costs have come down on both the forage and grain side, it remains important to make meaningful assessment of available feed sources – especially given livestock market trends in recent years. 

Historically, corn has served as a relatively abundant and inexpensive source of energy. And typically, corn has proven more favorable as a supplemental energy source for beef cows when viewed on a cost-per-pound-of-TDN perspective. That’s been especially true during the past several years with corn gaining a distinct advantage versus hay.

Therefore, if extra energy is needed to maintain cows through the winter and into spring calving, one might want to make this comparison, based on local feed costs. It should be noted that excess supplementation of corn to beef cows on forage diets can prove undesirable – causing a shift in the rumen population and subsequent decline in digestibility of TDN initially available through forage.

Related:Producers turn up the hay production in 2016


Nevertheless, limited supplementation of corn may prove to be a more valuable, cost-efficient manner to add energy to the diet versus just feeding more hay. 

Do you ever consider supplementing cows with corn to ensure they receive sufficient energy?

How do the costs in your area shake out for this type of comparison? Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

About the Author(s)

Nevil Speer

Nevil Speer serves as an industry consultant and is based in Bowling Green, KY.

Nevil Speer has extensive experience and involvement with the livestock and food industry including various service and consultation projects spanning such issues as market competition, business and economic implications of agroterrorism, animal identification, assessment of price risk and market volatility on the producer segment, and usage of antibiotics in animal agriculture.
Dr. Speer writes about many aspects regarding agriculture and the food industry with regular contribution to BEEF and Feedstuffs.  He’s also written several influential industry white papers dealing with issues such as changing business dynamics in the beef complex, producer decision-making, and country-of-origin labeling.
He serves as a member of the Board of Directors for the National Institute for Animal Agriculture.
Dr. Speer holds both a PhD in Animal Science and a Master’s degree in Business Administration.

Contact him at [email protected].

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
BEEF Magazine is the source for beef production, management and market news.

You May Also Like