What are the implications of the Cattle on Feed report?

Corn Belt placements show that farmers will market some of their abundant corn harvest through cattle.

Nevil Speer

November 23, 2017

2 Min Read
What are the implications of the Cattle on Feed report?

Interpretation of implications following USDA’s monthly Cattle on Feed reports is always interesting and certainly, last Friday’s report is no different. However, November’s report may be especially significant from a placement perspective.  

First, October’s total placements equaled 2.39 million head. That makes October the 10th consecutive month in 2017 in which placements are up year over year. To date, the placement total is 19.615 million head – 1.64 million head bigger versus this same time last year and the biggest January-through-October total since 2011. 

Meanwhile, feedyard arrival totals during the past six months are running 1.044 million cattle ahead of 2016; the front-end of those cattle are now influencing the marketing side and will continue to do so into the spring.   


Second, and perhaps more significant, are placements in Nebraska, Iowa, and South Dakota. These three states combined for a new monthly record of 909,000 head. Additionally, that total represents 38% of all placements – also a new record.

Finally, the 12-month moving average in the three states is running at 627,000 head – up sharply from just a year ago when it was closer to 530,000 head. 

Evidently, cattle feeders in the Corn Belt states intend to market their surplus corn through livestock. The November Cattle on Feed report reveals the reckoning of that occurrence. This will be an important component to monitor in coming months as we progress into the spring marketing season. Fed cattle basis could be influenced by these events. 

How do you perceive the uptick in placements in Nebraska, Iowa and South Dakota? Do you see this trend continuing? What influence might that have on fed cattle prices? Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

Nevil Speer is based in Bowling Green, Ky., and serves as vice president of U.S. operations for AgriClear, Inc. https://www.agriclear.com/– a wholly-owned subsidiary of TMX Group Limited. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the TMX Group Limited and Natural Gas Exchange Inc.

About the Author(s)

Nevil Speer

Nevil Speer serves as an industry consultant and is based in Bowling Green, KY.

Nevil Speer has extensive experience and involvement with the livestock and food industry including various service and consultation projects spanning such issues as market competition, business and economic implications of agroterrorism, animal identification, assessment of price risk and market volatility on the producer segment, and usage of antibiotics in animal agriculture.
Dr. Speer writes about many aspects regarding agriculture and the food industry with regular contribution to BEEF and Feedstuffs.  He’s also written several influential industry white papers dealing with issues such as changing business dynamics in the beef complex, producer decision-making, and country-of-origin labeling.
He serves as a member of the Board of Directors for the National Institute for Animal Agriculture.
Dr. Speer holds both a PhD in Animal Science and a Master’s degree in Business Administration.

Contact him at [email protected].

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
BEEF Magazine is the source for beef production, management and market news.

You May Also Like