Hay-Saving Tips

"Management of input costs is a key business concern and can mean the difference between operational profit or loss; when it comes to hay waste, using the right type of bale feeder can make a significant cost-savings difference," says Dave Lalman, Oklahoma State University (OSU) Extension beef cattle specialist. Though he was speaking to cow-calf producers specifically, the implications apply to stocker producers, too.

October 16, 2011

1 Min Read
Beef logo in a gray background | Beef

"Management of input costs is a key business concern and can mean the difference between operational profit or loss; when it comes to hay waste, using the right type of bale feeder can make a significant cost-savings difference," says Dave Lalman, Oklahoma State University (OSU) Extension beef cattle specialist. Though he was speaking to cow-calf producers specifically, the implications apply to stocker producers, too.

Research conducted by Lalman and other OSU researchers indicates that using a cone-style feeder or modified cone feeder with a sheeted bottom should reduce hay waste to 5%-6% of the original bale weight.

"We found that open-bottom hay feeders can waste as much as 21% of the original bale weight," Lalman explains.

The OSU study examined four bale feeder designs:

  • A conventional open-bottom steel ring,

  • A sheeted-bottom steel ring,

  • A polyethylene pipe ring and

  • A modified cone feeder with a sheeted bottom.

    The researchers discovered that differences in hay-feeder design don't restrict dry matter intake by the cattle, but can significantly affect the amount of feed wasted and subsequently the amount of hay fed.

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
BEEF Magazine is the source for beef production, management and market news.

You May Also Like