Beef Magazine is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Two brown cows and a calf standing in a green pasture reidecki/Getty Images
EARLY WEANING OPTION: We often think of early weaning as an alternative during drought conditions, but it can also effectively extend the grazing season, thus reducing the need for stored forage.

Could early weaning increase your profits?

Buckeye Beef Brief: The need for stored forage could be decreased.

Over the last couple of years, making hay in a timely manner has been nearly impossible. There just were not three- or four-day windows of dry weather without water standing in the fields. The result was a lot of poor-quality hay, producing cows with poor body condition scores (BCS) coming out of the winter. 

This year, hay production has started out much better for most people. We had a couple nice dry periods in late May and early June that allowed baling of good-quality hay. The issue this year is quantity. Many people are reporting reductions of 30% to 50% in tonnage of first-cutting hay. There are probably two factors that are causing this. First, the cold weather and numerous frost and freeze events in April and May slowed down hay growth. Much of the alfalfa was at bud stage on June 1 instead of flowering. This likely helped the quality but hurt the quantity. The second factor is, we simply would expect less hay when it is baled at the beginning of June than the end of June. Time will tell whether the season-long hay production remains low, or if second and third cuttings make up the difference.

Pluses to early weaning

It is never too early to plan. There are options to consider to be sure enough forage will be available for the winter. This comes down to either producing more forage or reducing the need for forage. Many good articles have been written on alternative forage production for increasing available forage, so I am going to skip over that. I will concentrate on reducing the need for stored forage. We often think of early weaning as an alternative during drought conditions, but it can also effectively extend the grazing season, which will reduce the need for stored forage.

Studies in both North and South Dakota have reported reductions in daily forage consumption between 25% and 40% associated with early weaning. We know that cows nursing calves require more forage, but we also need to remember those calves are eating between 2% and 2.5% of their body weight a day in dry matter. This reduction in forage use is only valuable if managed in a way to take advantage of it. The reduced consumption could allow more days of grazing on each section, or some sections could be skipped over to allow stockpiling and extend the grazing season.

Early weaning also provides the opportunity to remove cull cows from the herd before seasonal low prices occur. According to USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service data over the last five years, September cull cows have typically brought at least $5 per cwt more than November culls. Cows nursing calves often continue to lose weight up to the time the calves are weaned. A study by Landblum et al. in North Dakota showed a decrease in cow weight of 136 pounds with a November versus August weaning. This could amount to an extra $150. Holding these cull cows until traditional weaning time, while calves continue to nurse, may result in a smaller payday and less forage remaining in the pasture. Early weaning will also allow retained cows to put on body condition from pasture forage before heading into winter and using stored forage. A 5 to 7 BCS at the beginning of the calving season will increase the likelihood of cycling early and getting pregnant early the next season. Having a calf early in the breeding season is one of the most important determinants of profitability. An increased BCS can have long-term impacts on productivity.

There is a downside, though

The downside to early weaning is that younger calves weigh less. If calves are sold directly off or the cows and ownership is not retained, this would mean a smaller payday. The lighter (younger) calves will bring a higher price per pound, but this will not make up the difference in the total payment received for larger calves. The value of forage saved and increase in body condition of the cows need to be accounted for when looking at early weaning. If early weaning extends the grazing season, and a producer has plenty of good-quality hay, the producer could sell some of that hay at a premium. Early weaning could pay off.

A final point to consider would be keeping weaned calves and backgrounding them. Early weaning and then backgrounding can allow you to put some inexpensive gain on the calves. In addition, if processing facilities are still backed up as we reach the end of summer, early weaning and then backgrounding of the calves can provide a little extra flexibility for timing of marketing to avoid backlogged market conditions.

Kreager is the agriculture and natural resources Extension educator for Licking County, Ohio, and a member of the OSU Extension Beef Team. The Beef Team publishes the weekly Ohio BEEF Cattle letter; find it at beef.osu.edu.

 

 

Hide comments
account-default-image

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish