JBS pays $52.5M to partially settle beef antitrust litigation

Settlement still subject to court approval and other beef packers involved have not reached a similar agreement.

Jacqui Fatka, Policy editor

February 2, 2022

4 Min Read
Beef meat case GettyImages-85637158.jpg
BEEF PRICE FIXING: JBS offers settlement agreement in antitrust litigation claiming it colluded with other meat packers to set beef prices. Getty Images

JBS announced that it has entered into an agreement to partially settle the In re Beef Antitrust Litigation. The settlement, which is subject to court approval, agrees to pay the direct purchaser plaintiff class $52.5 million, according to a JBS company spokesperson. The nation’s four largest beef packers – Tyson, Cargill, JBS and National Beef – were included in an antitrust lawsuit filed in June 2020 for potential cattle market manipulation in a class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court of Minnesota by Central Grocers.

“While JBS does not admit liability for the claims alleged as part of this case, it believes this decision is in the best interest of the company. JBS will continue to vigorously defend its interests against the other classes,” the JBS spokesperson adds.

Counsel for the Central Grocers Daniel Karon, consumer attorney at Karon LLC, says the settlement by JBS is a positive development for the class. Litigation against the other defendants is moving forward.

In the action offered by JBS, the court still needs to provide preliminary settlement approval. After notice issues to the class, the court will hold a final hearing where it will consider finally approving the procedures for payout to the entities included in the direct purchaser class action. Karon says the approval process typically takes several months.

The class action lawsuit claimed that the beef processing companies “engaged in tactics including purchasing fewer cattle than a competitive market would otherwise demand and running their processing plants at less than available capacity.” The class action lawsuit added that these practices created surpluses in the cattle market and shortages in the wholesale beef market, which in turn, drove down the prices the companies paid for cattle and boosted the prices they could command for beef.

The lawsuit claimed that the defendants conspired by routinely exchanging supply, pricing and other sensitive information. This also included routinely selling beef to each other and frequent meetings between each other’s executives and key employees.

“Starting in 2015, wholesale beef prices showed unusual trends. The per-pound price of cattle had historically stayed within 20 to 40 cents of the per-pound average wholesale price of beef,” the original court document stated.

According to USDA Economic Research Service data, the average spread between the average farm value of cattle and wholesale value of beef was substantially higher from January 2015 to the present than it was in the preceding five years. From 2010 through 2014, the average farm-to-wholesale spread was about $34, but from 2015 through 2018 it was about $54, a 59% increase, the court filing stated.

The class action details that the “conspiracy” allowed the companies to enlarge their operating margins throughout the period. By the end of 2018, Tyson and JBS were reporting record margins in their beef business. Tyson reported an operating margin of nearly 7%, almost double its 2014 operating margin. JBS reported a higher beef business of 10.2%.

Still no answers from DOJ investigation

In May 2020, the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division appeared to open an investigation into the four big meat processors; however, despite calls from those on Congress and the industry, nothing has been revealed on this manner. In a statement, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association says the settlement is "deeply disturbing" considering DOJ has not released any findings or provided cattle producers with an update on progress.

In August 2019, following a fire at the Tyson plant in Holcomb, KS, NCBA sent a letter to USDA requesting an examination of price discrepancies in fed cattle markets. Again in 2020, NCBA took its plea directly to the White House, which then directed DOJ to investigate possible wrongdoing in the cattle markets. NCBA has also worked directly with members of Congress to press DOJ for an update and information about its investigation.

“America’s cattle producers expect and deserve full transparency on any, and all, information related to the ongoing market investigations. NCBA encourages the government to finalize its investigation so we can fully understand any damage that may have been caused,” said Colin Woodall, NCBA CEO. “It is clear from this settlement that cattle producers still don’t have all the information they have demanded and is deserved. The DOJ has an obligation to finish their investigation. Cattle producers do not have years to wait for the government to determine whether there has been wrongdoing, we demand answers now.”

About the Author(s)

Jacqui Fatka

Policy editor, Farm Futures

Jacqui Fatka grew up on a diversified livestock and grain farm in southwest Iowa and graduated from Iowa State University with a bachelor’s degree in journalism and mass communications, with a minor in agriculture education, in 2003. She’s been writing for agricultural audiences ever since. In college, she interned with Wallaces Farmer and cultivated her love of ag policy during an internship with the Iowa Pork Producers Association, working in Sen. Chuck Grassley’s Capitol Hill press office. In 2003, she started full time for Farm Progress companies’ state and regional publications as the e-content editor, and became Farm Futures’ policy editor in 2004. A few years later, she began covering grain and biofuels markets for the weekly newspaper Feedstuffs. As the current policy editor for Farm Progress, she covers the ongoing developments in ag policy, trade, regulations and court rulings. Fatka also serves as the interim executive secretary-treasurer for the North American Agricultural Journalists. She lives on a small acreage in central Ohio with her husband and three children.

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
BEEF Magazine is the source for beef production, management and market news.

You May Also Like